Hendrick plane crash trial could start later this month
By Bob Pockrass - Associate Editor
Monday, April 13, 2009
More than four years after a Hendrick Motorsports plane crash that killed 10 people on the way to the NASCAR Cup race Oct. 24, 2004, at Martinsville Speedway, lawsuits over who was responsible for the crash could finally go to trial in the next couple of weeks.
A final pretrial conference is set for Friday in cases involving Hendrick Motorsports, the estates of the pilots, the U.S. government and the widows of Hendrick Motorsports engine builder Randy Dorton, general manager Jeff Turner and Tony Stewart pilot Scott Lathram (a passenger on the plane). The trial could start as early as next Monday in U.S. District Court in Winston-Salem, N.C.
At issue is who is responsible for the accident – HMS Holdings (parent company of Hendrick Motorsports), the pilots themselves or the air-traffic controllers. According to court documents, the crash resulted when the pilots overshot the airport by five miles and failed to follow the missed-approach procedure for the Martinsville/Blue Ridge Airport, which requires a climbing right turn to avoid Bull Mountain. The plane, in heavy cloud cover, climbed without turning and crashed into the mountain, killing all 10 aboard.
According to court documents, the government blames Hendrick pilots Richard Tracy and Elizabeth Morrison for failing to follow procedure. Hendrick and the widows believe the government shares some of the responsibility for the actions of the air-traffic controllers. Widow Dianne Dorton’s complaint alleges that the air-traffic controllers did not attempt to contact the pilots even though the plane was descending at 2,500 feet above the end of the runway and continued toward the mountain for more than four minutes until the crash. Hendrick alleges in court documents that the controllers ignored a visual and audible alarm specifically designed to warn them that the aircraft was dangerously close to terrain.
The government alleges that the air-traffic controllers were not responsible because the pilots had been given clearance to land without the use of air-traffic control but instead just by using their instruments; that the pilots were using instruments not certified for such a landing; and that the pilots still could have avoided the accident if they made a climbing right turn once they realized their missed approach.
Hendrick already has settled suits with widows Tracy Lathram and Linda Turner but not with Dorton. It is asking for the government to contribute to those settlements, as well as an out-of-court settlement with the family of DuPont executive Joe Jackson. The estates of the pilots also want the government to contribute to any awards they are liable for.
A judge has already ruled that Dorton cannot bring a claim against Hendrick Motorsports because it is a workers compensation issue, but she is bringing a separate claim against the pilots’ estates for “willful, wanton, and reckless negligence.”
The trial, in front of U.S. District Court Judge Thomas D. Schroeder, likely will be conducted in two phases.
The first phase will be a jury trial on Dorton’s claims against the pilots’ estates, and the second phase will be a bench trial (a trial in front of just the judge and not a jury) that will focus on the claims against the United States for the actions of the air-traffic controllers.
All sides could still reach a settlement prior to the start or during the trials.
Among those killed in the crash were team owner Rick Hendrick’s son, Ricky, as well as Rick’s brother, John (president of Hendrick Motorsports) and John’s daughters Kimberly and Jennifer.
Miss Sprint Cup | On Twitter Now
Popular News
-
Roush Fenway Racing’s Carl Edwards avoids suspension, placed on probation for intentionally wrecking Brad Keselowski at Atlanta
Comments (320) -
Brad Keselowski says he won't back down, will continue to race aggressively despite controversial crash with Carl Edwards
Comments (303) -
Angry Carl Edwards causes frightening crash when he retaliates against Brad Keselowski at Atlanta
Comments (184) -
MONDAY MORNING CREW CHIEF: NASCAR faces a big question – what to do with Carl Edwards?
Comments (154) -
After Carl Edwards-Brad Keselowski incident, paybacks on the track are more acceptable, NASCAR drivers say
Comments (152)
Recent Headlines
-
New spoiler to replace rear wing on Sprint Cup cars beginning at Martinsville, NASCAR officials confirm
Post Comment -
Ryan Truex to make Nationwide Series debut in July for MWR
Comments (1) -
When Jeff Gordon gets booed, it still reminds him of Dale Earnhardt
Post Comment -
STOCKCARTOON: What will do more to create buzz and interest in NASCAR?
Post Comment -
Dale Earnhardt Jr. says he hit 213 mph as drivers battled high closing rates and drag at Talladega test
Comments (5)
Poll PositionView All
How should NASCAR penalize Carl Edwards?
Promotions
-
Tweet your thoughts about each race and join the conversation with other fans.
-
Drive an authentic NASCAR Sprint Cup car at the NASCAR Racing Experience.
Comments
6 responses to "Hendrick plane crash trial could start later this month". Post a Comment.
Meg said:
Apr 13, 2009 at 2:50 PMThis is just so sad all around. I hope the jury dismisses Dorton’s claim against the pilots’ estates. It was an accident. I wonder how Mrs. Dorton would have liked it if someone sued her husband because of an accident caused by an engine her husband had built! Even if she wins, it won't bring back Randy.
Debbie Webb said:
Apr 13, 2009 at 5:20 PMYes, it is an accident and accidents happen all the time. It doesn't mean we have to go around sueing each other. I hate when people do that. That seems to be the first thing on everyones mind. What I didn't understand was that if Hendrick settled with Lathram and Turner, why didn't he just settle with Dorton. That doesn't sound right.
Doc Lehman said:
Apr 13, 2009 at 6:23 PMRegarding #2---settle with Dorton; One element you will find in ALL such cases is The Lawyers. They are the ones that make the settlements. Pick Up ANY phone book and the first thing you will see is an Ad for some Ambulance-Chasing Lawyer.
Jay Hauser said:
Apr 13, 2009 at 6:51 PMI'm surprised this is still going on. Four years is too long. The first sentence kinda bugs me. Our legal system is being used to find out who to blame for a plane crash. Last time I checked, it usually comes down to two things, equipment failure or pilot error. The crash happened and it sucks for everyone involved, but trying to blame air traffic controllers for this is ridiculous in my opinion. The pilots are the ones in control and ultimately make the decisions.
Howard Englishman said:
Apr 13, 2009 at 8:01 PMThat airport is the worst airport on the circuit. nobody likes flying in there. that morning it was the lady pilot who wasn't familiar with the place. Tony's chopper pilot was along for the ride too. Randy's wife wants a bigger settlement than the rest. That's the reason it is taking as long as it has.
K D said:
Apr 14, 2009 at 12:36 PMThank you Mr. Englishman for clarifying that! And that is a very good point that MEG made too! I believe an aviation lawsuit can take up to seven years to settle. The widow filed the lawsuit in 2005, correct? I feel sorry for the pilots' families. It is really sad for all families involved.