On the Loose Side

A NASCAR BLOG BY Kenny Bruce

Why should NASCAR announce substances in test results?

May 17 2009

CONCORD, N.C. – OK, so I’ve been mulling it over, trying to understand why some folks say NASCAR needs to publicize the specific drug or drugs that got Jeremy Mayfield indefinitely suspended.

And I’ve got to be honest. I’m hitting a roadblock.

Some of the folks who think NASCAR should be the one to “come clean” are fellow media members, several others are licensed participants in the sport. I respect all of them. I just don’t agree with them.

What could possibly be gained by releasing the specific information? Mayfield’s career has already been damaged, and if it’s up to anyone to make additional information public knowledge, it should be Mayfield.

If he indeed was suspended for something as innocent as mixing prescription and over-the-counter medications, as he claims, what does he have to lose by releasing the specific names of those medications?

Mayfield, owner and driver of Mayfield Motorsports, is one of six licensed members of the NASCAR community to be suspended this year under the sanctioning body’s revised drug testing policy. It’s worth noting that there was no such public outcry when NASCAR announced that Paul Chodora, John Boyd, Richard Gray, Tony Martin and Ben Williams had been indefinitely suspended. Where was the outrage then? Where was the concern? No one, to my knowledge, demanded that NASCAR identify the specific substances in each of those cases.

NASCAR adopted the substance-abuse policy, the drivers and everyone else applying for a NASCAR license agreed to abide by it, and, according to the test results, Mayfield is just one of the latest to violate the policy.

As a result, NASCAR took action. Not because of rumors. Not because of innuendo.

NASCAR maintains the right to “publish the results of any test or tests conducted ....” Thus far, officials with the sanctioning body have declined to do so. I would think those who have been found in violation of the policy would be grateful for that.
 

Comments

5 responses to "Why should NASCAR announce substances in test results?". Post a Comment.
  1. 1
    Worm Dirt said:
    May 17, 2009 at 1:17 PM

    Reminds me of a poem-----"First they came for the guy who sweeps the shop.... and I said NOTHING. Then they came for the shock-specialist...... and I remained SILENT. Then they locked up the engine-tuner....... and I did NOT protest. Then they came for the guy who uses that long awkward pole thing to hand a water-bottle to the driver through his window during a pit-stop..... and I did NOT speak out. And then they came for ME........ but there was NO ONE left to speak out for me." ----Klaus von Niemoller Junior- 1892

  2. 2
    Ralph Dailey said:
    May 18, 2009 at 9:15 AM

    I'm hitting a roadblock too. Any person who is drug tested is entitled to a written report of the test results. Why is it that NASCAR and this lab will only communicate the results verbally to Mayfield? Who is NASCAR protecting? Mayfield or themselves.

  3. 3
    Joe White said:
    May 18, 2009 at 10:15 AM

    Mayfield has made his statement. He said he took only presctiption and over the counter meds. Nascar is the one that looks bad at this moment. You say Mayfields career is already damaged but I think if his story is correct it is far less damaging than if he used cocaine or herion. There is a scale on drug use even in the law. Some carry more sevier penalties than others. Jeremy's career could still have a flicker of hope depending on what he tested positive for.

  4. 4
    Kenny Bruce said:
    May 20, 2009 at 10:33 PM

    WD: That's an interesting analogy, and one I'd agree with were it not for the fact that a third party, in this case an independent lab, handled the test in question. Could they have made a mistake? Certainly. But I stand by my statement that Jeremy could have boosted his own defense by specifying what it was he took. Then again, I'm not in his shoes.

  5. 5
    steadman_sam said:
    May 23, 2009 at 10:44 PM

    You know, MLB, the NFL, the NBA and NHL all, I believe, announce the results of players who are suspended for testing positive. In baseball, they not only tell you it was steroids, but they tell you what kind. You hear all the time about athletes testing positive for marijuana, cocaine, crack, etc. Why should NASCAR be any different? At least, in this case, it would set the records straight, now wouldn't it?

Post a Comment

Disclaimer: All comments are subject to filtering for language, and libelous content. Comments are intended to encourage spirited debate and discussion about the subject matter contained within the articles and ARE NOT intended for personal or demeaning attacks directed at other users. We reserve the right to remove any comments deemed inappropriate. Users who violate this policy may be banned from posting comments on the site.

Comment Preview

Mar 14, 2010 at 2:31 PM
You said:

You must login before you can post comments or rate content.

If you don't have an account you can create a free one here.

Kenny Bruce

Kenny Bruce is a three-time winner of the National Motorsports Press Association's George Cunningham Writer of the Year Award. He joined Street & Smith's Sports Group in 2001.

Getting Social

Latest Tweets

Loading tweets...

NASCAR Schedules

fox

Food City 500

Bristol Motor Speedway
01:00 PM, 03/21/2010
Check out the SPEED Calendar

Poll PositionView All

How should NASCAR penalize Carl Edwards?

Promotions

  • Tweet your thoughts about each race and join the conversation with other fans.

  • Drive an authentic NASCAR Sprint Cup car at the NASCAR Racing Experience.